search email community favorite this article chev-right latest posts article list comments tags video article login twitter facebook menu pinterest whatsapp

Manager hesitates when HR orders termination of older employee who clocks in and out from home: 'I know she knows it's wrong'

Advertisement
  • An older woman sitting on a couch and holding a notebook works on a laptop on a coffee table in front of her
  • Advertisement
  • Termination I Don't Agree With

    I'm being asked to terminate someone that has regularly (3-4 times a week) clocked in and out from home.
  • This is an onsite position, so that's definitely not okay, and I'm not going to defend her actions.
  • Our agency considers this "time theft". She was caught because one of our HR reps decided to use the GPS to track her work phone and saw that she was not onsite (on a few occasions) while clocked in for work.
  • Advertisement
  • \*background, she's an older woman who's had a lot of health issues including surgery that put her on dis lity leave for a few weeks, taking care of grandkids that she didn't sign up for and (probably the problem) I like her and she works her a off.
  • An office worker sitting at a desk makes notes in a folder with an open laptop on the desk in front of her
  • Advertisement
  • 2) an excellent employee in every other way, the program will be greatly affected by her loss.
  • the grass isn't always greener. 3) It's an "obvious" rule and a written policy but never explicitly stated to her.
  • Advertisement
  • 4) her manager, and myself at times filling in for him (I'm his manager) have allowed "working from home" with her that aren't exactly within policy because of her health issues.
  • 5) I've had to terminate 2 employees for this same thing but wasn't allowed to terminate someone that had incredibly more egregious time theft but found out later that she was in the process of suing the organization so we didn't do anything.
  • 6) if they dug this deep on lots of employees I think they would find the same thing, his is speculation I know HR's reasons: 1) they've terminated others for the exact same thing.
  • Advertisement
  • A woman holding a cardboard box of belongings walks through a doorway
  • AdMurky3039 Is she violating the policy for a health-related reason? If so, does she need to be accommodated rather than terminated? On a side note, your company seems clueless if they have lost multiple employees and still can't figure out that they need a hybrid policy at a minimum.
  • Vlad_REAM Original Poster's Reply She is! And that's exactly why I think it should start with a conversation and not an immediate termination. Tell me about it, I'm already in "trouble" because my programs allow a 1 day remote schedule. The only reason I got away with it is because I had already been going on so long It's a social services job and definitely being I person is a huge part of the job but I give a remote day to my team to get their administrative tasks done. Otherwise the next coac
  • Advertisement
  • dscol715 Why are you "allowing" a violation of policy that has resulted in the termination of other people in the past? Seems like you really did this person a disservice.
  • Ok-Double-7982 No. She should have asked for some schedule adjustments if she had issues. Or is her job one of those where if she shows up 15 minutes late, she can stay 15 minutes?
  • CodyRyan86 I mean... it's a tough situation. I went to bat over a write up I disagreed with. They wanted me to write someone up for issues that preceded me being at the company by months. I felt I was in the right because I was not there to witness the behaviors and I believe on delivering accountability in a timely manner. Say within 30 days of the instance. Well, I won overall and did not deliver the write up. But I also lost considerably in terms of the higher ups buy in to myself. My image w
  • Advertisement
  • Vlad_REAM Original Poster's Reply Thank you for sharing. And I don't think I'm coming from an objective opinion because there are other team members that I would have no problem with letting go the same infractions. She has a lot going on in her life that's out of her control. Maybe I'm more mad at myself (or her actual manager) for not catching it in the moment and addressing it so it didn't turn into a frequent occurrence.
  • Negotiation-Solid "And I don't think I'm coming from an objective opinion because there are other team members that I would have no problem with letting go the same infractions." I don't agree with the policy but it's important to be fair and consistent. That sentence quoted above would garner a big yikes from HR
  • Big_Two_6321 Seems to be a lot going on with her. Guessing this is in the US, where humanity generally seems to be lacking, but more so in the work space. At-will working conditions appear to mean everyone is expendable at the drop of a hat, regardless of personal circumstances or affect on the company. In this situation, the loss of her job would likely cause a crisis for her and big ripples in her family. Don't you first need to understand why she's doing what she's doing and then see what the

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article
Show Comments
Next Article