• Memebase
  • Animals
  • Cringe
  • Fandom
  • Food
  • Geek
  • Internet Trends
  • Parenting
  • Random Memes
  • Reddit
  • TikTok
  • Twitter Discourse
  • Wholesome

  • Links
  • About Us
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • DMCA Policy
    • search email community favorite this article chev-right latest posts article list comments tags video article login twitter facebook menu pinterest whatsapp

    Manager fires 27-year-old in company restructure, gets upset when he refuses to train 23-year-old replacement paid $15k less: 'I'm standing up for myself'

    Employers like to remind us that we're replaceable, but don't enjoy it when we react accordingly.

    Most people in the working world learn sooner or later that most of the time, it is not interested in acting in our best interests. When making a profit is the bottom line, things like providing a dignified employee experience fall low on the list of priorities. Anybody who is a part of the corporate world is nothing more than a number on a spreadsheet to somebody above them in the professional pecking order.

    Still, many bosses do an OK job of hiding this unpleasant fact until you are no longer useful to them. It means that the switch-up can come as even more of an unpleasant surprise. The reality is, a lot of companies will happily get rid of employees if they think that they can get the same work for a lot cheaper. It is a hurtful experience for even the most cynical of employees to go through, not least because they have to deal with the job market again (and potentially have the same thing happen afterwards). In these situations, most people want nothing more than a clean break so they don't have to deal with too many painful memories.

    Author image for Ally Perry Ally Perry
    Add us on Google
    Advertisement
    • a man wearing a coat and glasses walks away from an office building, holding a cardboard box full of files and belongings
      via Getty Images (Unsplash+)

      Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.

    • Advertisement

    • Unfortunately, some employers have no issue with adding insult to injury by making sure they get the best value they can out of their investment before they let it go for good. 

      In this story, a man working at a marketing company was outraged when his position was eliminated, but he was still expected to train his replacement. He had been told that he was being laid off because of restructuring, and then he found out the younger hire who would take over his position was going to be paid significantly less.

      He refused to take part in any direct training, reasoning that it was not something that the company deserved after the way he had been treated. However, this upset his manager, and some of his coworkers felt that he was being unfair. He wanted to know if he was taking things too far.

    • Am I wrong for refusing to train my replacement after they fired me?

      So I (27M) have been working at this marketing company for 3 years. I've gotten great reviews, never been written up, always meet my deadlines. Last week my boss calls me into her office and says they're "restructuring" and my position is being eliminated. I have 3 weeks left.
      via WinInteresting9368
    • Then she hits me with this: they want me to train my replacement. A girl named Sophie who's 23 and fresh out of college. They're paying her $15k LESS than what I make, which is obviously why they're doing this.
      via WinInteresting9368
    • a young woman in business attire holds a clipboard and smiles
      via Getty Images (Unsplash+)

      Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.

    • Advertisement
    • I said I'm not comfortable training someone to do my job when you just fired me. My boss said its "part of my job responsibilities during the transition period" and that it would be "unprofessional" not to help.
      via WinInteresting9368
    • I straight up said no. I told her I'll finish my current projects and document my processes but I'm not doing hands-on training. She said that's "disappointing" and that she "expected more from me."
      via WinInteresting9368
    • Advertisement
    • Some of my coworkers are saying I should just do it because its only 3 weeks and I don't want to burn bridges. But like, they're literally replacing me with someone cheaper. Why should I make that easier for them?? My girlfriend thinks I'm being petty. I think I'm standing up for myself. AITJ? TL;DR: Got fired and company wants me to train my cheaper replacement. I refused and now people say I'm being unprofessional and petty.
      via WinInteresting9368
    • a man wearing a coat and glasses stands outside an office building, looking into the cardboard box of belongings he is holding
      via Getty Images (Unsplash+)

      Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.

    • Advertisement
    • wengelite Since your position is being eliminated there is no training necessary.
      via wengelite
    • OP WinInteresting9368 Yeah, that's what I think too. Also, I would have been fine with it if I was fired because of my incompetence. But i am not. Am I wrong?
      via WinInteresting9368
    • Unfair_Language5762 Dont train your replacement unless you're being promoted. Your boss said your job is being eliminated which means no one should be trained to replace you. Also if your boss truly wanted you to train this 23 year old, you should be demanding a pay raise & 2 coworkers (witnesses) to be present during said training Your coworkers are basic bitches who probably have their noses up the bosses ass.
      via Unfair_Language5762
    • Advertisement
    • OP WinInteresting9368 That makes sense. Thank you for all your insights. I guess I will be the petty king and I will not do as they say. It hurts me to be repalced because they need to cut budget
      via WinInteresting9368
    • Adelucas NTA. They fired you, you didn't quit. Do what you need to do to finish what needs finishing, and they can train the new hire to their standards.
      via Adelucas
    • NTJ. Scared Treacle_7805 It's a common practice but that doesn't make it right. If more people stood up like you are, this would happen less. They're literally underpaying a vulnerable young adult, while simultaneously throwing you to the sharks. They can (dis) respectfully kiss your ass.
      via Scared_Treacle_7805
    • Advertisement
    • Usual-Owl9395 "I expected not to be fired just so you can pay somebody $15 grand less. So no."
      via Usual-Owl9395
    • best_muffins98 Your job is eliminated and you are being laid off. No person is replacing you, the job is gone. If they say otherwise it is wrongful dismissal! Just finish your projects and leave.
      via best_muffins98
    • pwolf 1771 "Burn bridges" is such a false threat for rubes. This will in no way impact your ability to find a new job. Stick to your guns the new hire can figure it out the same way you did.
      via pwolf1771
    • Advertisement
    • Adventurous-Bar520 Your position is being made redundant so there is no reason to train anyone to do it. No it is not part of your responsibilities, they are trying to guilt you into it being one of your duties.
      via Adventurous-Bar520
    • earthtobobby This happened to me and it's all semantics. The position being eliminated is the one the OP holds. The new hire will have a differently titled position but doing the same work.
      via earthtobobby
    • Boo-Bo097 I got passed over for a promotion (to a job I was already doing) then was expected to train the person they promoted instead. I refused and was told I had a bad attitude and wasn't a team player. Eff that noise, I wasn't getting paid to train and far as I was concerned, the other person's incompetence wasn't my problem.
      via Boo-Boo97

    Stay entertained and up to date by following us on Facebook and Instagram!

    Tags

    employee fired marketing work training company manager
    Like
    Scroll Down For The Next Article
    Show Comments

    Also From Memebase

    Grandmother scolds son for playing with his 2-year-old daughter, falsely claims they are neglecting 4-month-old son: 'She said we're spoiling her to the detriment of our son, and that he needs it more'

    Grandmother scolds son for playing with his 2-year-old daughter, falsely claims they are neglecting 4-month-old son: 'She said we're spoiling her to the detriment of our son, and that he needs it more'
    Next Article